<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bell Curves and Power Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://72.10.34.174/vss/2009/02/bell-curves-and-power-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://72.10.34.174/vss/2009/02/bell-curves-and-power-laws/</link>
	<description>An ARC Collaboration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 03:21:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotbook</title>
		<link>http://72.10.34.174/vss/2009/02/bell-curves-and-power-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-34012</link>
		<dc:creator>hotbook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropos-lab.net/vss/?p=237#comment-34012</guid>
		<description>infact, power law or Law of Power used in many sectors of life. This invention should create a better for scientist an even people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>infact, power law or Law of Power used in many sectors of life. This invention should create a better for scientist an even people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Rabinow</title>
		<link>http://72.10.34.174/vss/2009/02/bell-curves-and-power-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-27983</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Rabinow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropos-lab.net/vss/?p=237#comment-27983</guid>
		<description>Chris,
This is an interesting intervention and raises good questions. 
It does not make sense that only some form of XIXth century probability would qualify. If the newer forms of statistics and the like meet the &quot;verificationist&quot; mode of veridiction than so be it. But how that would alter things is important. Lyle Fearnley&#039;s work should come in here. 

The Object in biopolitical formations is &quot;bodies-populations&quot;. 
Et ainsi de suite.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
This is an interesting intervention and raises good questions.<br />
It does not make sense that only some form of XIXth century probability would qualify. If the newer forms of statistics and the like meet the &#8220;verificationist&#8221; mode of veridiction than so be it. But how that would alter things is important. Lyle Fearnley&#8217;s work should come in here. </p>
<p>The Object in biopolitical formations is &#8220;bodies-populations&#8221;.<br />
Et ainsi de suite.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

